Essay on Nietszche and Self Creation - 753 Words

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centurys, the Enlightenment was a term designated to the increasing amount of scientificic discoverys debunking religious theology. With humanitys loss of their once certified objectivity, the individual and his society sunk into the chaotic realm of insecurity revealing the seeds of a postmodern world. The German philosopher Nietzsche, deeming God is dead, saw the collapse of these collective truths of objectivity, showing the meaningless of the universe. Hence he located meaning and truth to be relative to the individual with his ability to surpass his chaotic existence through the will to power. In Nietszchean philosophy there is no absolute selfhood or archetypal basis in life. Though the†¦show more content†¦The value of the Ubersmensh is not the acceptance of the sanctity of life, but rather the embracement of life regardless of its value. It is an embracement of the totality of emotional experience and rationalistic impulses, a realization of mortality and living fully unto that demise. The Ubersmensh is not an ideal, virtue or objective but, rather an individuals own discovery and creation from himself in his experience; not a role model but a creation of yourself as your own. The embracement of life is not the only valuable notion of the Ubersmensh, as an artist his profound flux of vision and individuality helps generate the wills of others, helping them to recognize their own potential to be the God they see. In his art, or art itself, they see their own life and the vast and incomprehensible life of the Ubersmensch. It is only to often when an eye or ear da rts past what theyve heard or saw in confusion, giving no thought to its greater depth but merely their own superficial label, e.g. the many unconscious Marilyn Manson protesters. An Ubermensh is art itself, a creation from their own experiences. The ambiguousness of art, expressed by an Ubersmensh, shows the complex individuality and vastness of the experience these Ubersmesnch live in. By seeing art thus, it allows us to reflect on the smallness of our own lives, and if the world we adhere to is any near the vastness of what they have

The Backseat Driver A Journey Of Sexual Abuse - 944 Words

TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page—The Backseat Driver: A Journey of Sexual Abuse 1 Dedication* 3 An Address 4 Expository Essay 5 Backseat Driver 6 â€Å"Molest†* 7 Age 7 8 Teeth* 9 Old Friend 10 Traffic Guards* 11 Flashbacks* 12 Age 14 13 Letter to a Shadow* 14 Signature 15 Angeline 16 I’m fine* 17 Candle 18 Emancipation* 19 Changing the Story 20 Age 16 21 Running 22 Reflection 24 Notes 25 Bibliography 26 to my Angeline whom I will always believe is an angel sent to any others trapped in binds of your own minds do not fear freedom to the self-abused your glowing future deserves all you can offer and lastly my backseat driver I’ve enjoyed your company and bittersweet strength My Dear, Dear Reader, The day of my birth I was†¦show more content†¦I dare not let it escape. After so many years of playing tug of war with my past I grew fatigued. I didn’t have the energy to continue fighting it or to address it, so I just stayed idle. I was depressed and unresolved in my identity, so I allowed other to choose who I was. This resulted in a series of abusive relationships. In December of 2014 I met a woman named Angeline whose power of influence I will never understand. The same day I met her we had one conversation, and with her in the back of my mind I told my family of my abuse. After revealing myself to my parents and siblings I was able to see myself, truly—under all the remaining corroded layers of repression—for the first time. Since then I’ve conquered anxiety, depression, self-harm (physical and psychological), abusive relationships, and insecurity. I wrote this paper not only for shrouded sexual abuse victims, that they may free themselves, but also for anyone whose fear or insecurity has plagued every crevice of their life and who longs to be free. You have the power to free yourself, but it requires you to step out of your comfort zone. Before you can truly appreciate freedom you must truly appreciate yourself, which you cannot do without having to prioritize—especially when it is detrimental to your emotional or physical health—your needs over your wants, comforts and traditions. I am more than proud to say that the weight of sexual abuse has not been

Chernobyl (1237 words) Essay Example For Students

Chernobyl (1237 words) Essay ChernobylApril 26th 1986 marked the date of the worst nuclear accident to ever occur. Chernobyl, a nuclear power plant in Russia was undergoing routine safety tests that envolved running the reactor on less then full power, followed by a standard shut down. At Chernobyl’s reactor number 4 a specific test was designed to show that a coasting turbine could produce enough power to pump coolant through the reactor core while waiting for electricity from diesel generators. During the test turbine feed valves were closed to initiate turbine coasting, and automatic control rods were withdrawn from the core. When the steam valves to the turbine close, the pressure in the reactor should go up causing the boiling point of the water to increase. This creates more water in the reactor, increasing cooling. During this test there was a problem with the feed water supply, so the increase in cooling water did not happen. What did happen was an uncontrolled increase in the steam pressure. The operator saw this and started to shut down the reaction by reinserting the control rods. The initial insertion of the control rods caused the reaction to concentrate in the bottom of the reactor. The reactor power rose well above its maximum capacity. Fuel pellets shattered, reacting with the cooling water, creating high pressure in the fuel containers. This surge in pressure caused the fuel containers to rupture. This led to two severe explosions, one a steam explosion, the other a rapid expansion of fuel vapor. The force of these explosions lifted the pile cap, allowing air to enter the reactor. The graphite used in the reactor construction caught on fire, ending a horrible and tragic sequence of events, but beginning another. Local firemen, unaware of the dangerous amounts of radiation, were called in to put out the fire. All of the firemen died, either a result of the fire, or from breathing radioactive debris. Unfortunately, their heroic attempts were useless, because the core of the reactor was exposed making the fire much to hot for water to cool. The first thing the Russians did was try to cover up the accident. This turned out to be impossible, considering the amounts of radioactive debris released into the air. Shortly after the accident a nuclear power plant in Sweden measured high amounts of radioactivity in their area, called the Russians to inquire if there had been an accident. The Russians shortly thereafter alerted the press, and evacuated towns surrounding Chernobyl. This of course wasn’t their biggest problem. They needed to find the fuel that had escaped from the reactor in order to avoid another massive chain reaction. This was a huge problem due to the extreme amounts of radioact ivity inside the sarcophagus. They didn’t have the money for robots, so they sent in the Soviet Army. 3400 men were used on â€Å"roof runs† in which they’d go and collect samples from the roof of the reactor. During these missions soldiers could be subjected to 20 Rankin’s of radiation. Many people who have worked at Chernobyl have died from sudden heart failure. The Russian government denies that this has anything to do with their work at Chernobyl, but their have been too many deaths related to heart failure for it not to be. The next move was to find the fuel. Unlike American nuclear power plants that have their reactors over steel reinforced concrete the crazy Russians built their reactor on top of offices. Inside these offices radiation levels reach around 100 to 250 Rankin’s of radiation per hour. This means it would be impossible to ever work safely inside Chernobyl, unless of course you had a few hundred thousand years on your hands for th e radioactivity to fall to safe levels. Unfortunately they didn’t, they had to find the fuel before another chain reaction occurred, releasing more nuclear fallout into the environment. Throughout their early investigation they could find no clues to the whereabouts of the fuel. Finally, one cold December day in 1986, scientists came across a large highly radioactive mass approximately 2 meters across in size. Because of its unique shape they titled it the â€Å"Elephant’s Foot†. Their only dilemma was, what the heck is it? This problem probably would have been easy to solve if the Elephant’s foot wasn’t emitting 10,000 Rankins of radiation per hour. One of the scientists came up with the idea to shoot the â€Å"Elephant’s Foot† to obtain samples. Although they didn’t want to wreck the beauty of the â€Å"Elephant’s Foot† they decided it was a good idea (how pretty could solidified fuel be anyway?) Due to the extr eme bureaucracy of Russia’s government, finding a gun was much harder then one would assume. They first went to the army, only to be sent to the police, who sent them to the KGB, who sent them back to the police. They finally got a police man to come and shoot 30 rounds at the foot. They found that the â€Å"Elephant’s Foot† was composed of many layers and was made up of silicon dioxide mixed with fuel that had dripped from the reactors base. Now that they had more of an idea about what they were looking for, they decided the next place to look was the core. It took them half a year to break through, and when they did they were shocked to learn it was completely empty. This was good news safety wise, but that still left everyone scratching their heads dumbfounded. After the fuel shock, they decided to search the rooms under the reactor that were generating a lot of heat. They pooled all their money together and were able to buy a toy truck for 15 rubles (roughly $.52 at today’s exchange rate). Much to their dismay, the toy truck didn’t prove to be a wise investment, but it did detect a large mass that got them excited. They rigged up a camera dolly to go in, it found a lot of destruction, but no fuel. They had to go in themselves. .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .postImageUrl , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:hover , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:visited , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:active { border:0!important; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:active , .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6 .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ubb8de759b53a47fd58332c95c9ab40f6:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Assessing The Motivational Techniques Of Pepsi Business EssayThis time they were going directly under the reactor. This would be the most dangerous area they would investigate. What they found shocked them. Concrete was steaming from the floor, and below them they saw lava. They found some pretty crystals, they now call chernobalite, and learned that the lava was caused by nuclear fuel and sand. Of course this wasn’t the end of their problems, what fun would that be? The inside of the sarcophagus was falling apart. If it collapsed, a whole lot of radioactive dust would escape into the air, and probably wouldn’t do much for the Russian’s popularity. Thi s was a big threat, the reactor could collapse any day so it needed immediate attention. They could burry it in concrete, but that would make it hard to monitor. They could cover it in sand, except sands a good insulator. Or they could build a 2nd sarcophagus, but that might cost more then 15 rubles. What they did know is that whatever they did had to last longer then the pyramids. They needed help from other countries. Hopefully, with the knowledge learned from Chernobyl, and the rising need for nuclear energy, we can find a safer way run nuclear power plants. Science Essays

Lexical Ambiguity free essay sample

Lexical Ambiguity â€Å"What you see is what you believe on the basis of what you have conditioned yourself to accept. Your negative will be someone’s positive. † – Pushkar Shinde I’m always told since time immemorial that I have to speak and express myself because I have something to say but being an English major brought me in a point of realization wherein I learned how hard it is to be entirely understood. As my professor had always told me, meanings are in people, not in words. Language, being a system of communication, has a very delicate job to perform, particularly when it is being used by us humans.Words in fact communicate a whole personality and that’s why their correct usage has so much importance. But no language in the world has so far been able to claim that it is capable of communicating all that a human wants to communicate to another human. We will write a custom essay sample on Lexical Ambiguity or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Ambiguity will always be present. Ambiguity, as a language phenomenon, has a negative effect and some people consider it a curse. I could not blame them. People can have major misunderstandings by thinking someone is meaning one thing when their real meaning is totally different. Many times, these misunderstandings result in comedic action, but they can cause major trouble. Just as different cultures have varying customs and can insult one another if that is not understood and ambiguous language does the same. Words can cause miscommunications, misunderstandings, and basically just a lot of confusion. Ambiguity of language, then, seems to be at the focal of conflicting interests that abhor precision and accountability. It is the possible root of our chaos and could lead to heinous event such as war, terrorism, racism, etc.Ambiguity will always be a part of language complexities. If ambiguity is employed properly and appropriately, it will produce a magical effect. I will focus in this fact and attempt to show that even when perceived as a problem, ambiguity provides value. In any case, language ambiguity can be understood as an illustration of the complexity of language itself. Characterizing Ambiguity One of the building blocks of language comprehension is the ability to access the meaning of words as they are encountered and to develop an interpretation that is consistent with the context.This process becomes particularly interesting at a choice point in understanding, as is the case with lexically ambiguous words. When a word has multiple meanings, one meaning must be selected while somehow retaining the possibility of using the alternative meaning. Additionally, the working memory capacity of individual readers affects their ability to maintain various representations in the process of understanding a sentence (Miyake et al. , 1994). Many words are semantically ambiguous, and can refer to more than one concept. For example, bark can refer either to a part of a tree, or to the sound made by a dog.To understand such words, we must disambiguate between these different interpretations, normally on the basis of the context in which the word occurs. However, ambiguous words can also be recognized in isolation; when presented with a word like bark we are able to identify an appropriate meaning rapidly, and are often unaware of any other meanings. Words can be ambiguous in different ways. The two meanings of a word like bark are semantically unrelated, and seem to share the same written and spoken form purely by chance. Other words are ambiguous between highly related senses, which are systematically related to each other. For example, the word twist can refer to a bend in a road, an unexpected ending to a story, a type of dance, and other related concepts. The linguistic literature makes a distinction between these two types of ambiguity, and refers to them as homonymy and polysemy (Lyons, 1977; Cruse, 1986). Homonyms, such as the two meanings of bark, are said to be different words that by chance share the same orthographic and phonological form. On the other hand, a polysemous word like twist is considered to be a single word that has more than one sense.All standard dictionaries respect this distinction between word meanings and word senses; lexicographers routinely decide whether different usages of the same spelling should correspond to different lexical entries or different senses within a single entry. Many criteria (e. g. , etymological, semantic and syntactic) have been suggested to operationalise this distinction between senses and meanings. However, it is generally agreed that while the distinction appears easy to formulate, it is difficult, to apply with consistency and reliability.People will often disagree about whether two usages of a word are sufficiently related that they should be taken as senses of a single meaning rather than different meanings. This suggests that these two types of ambiguity may be best viewed as the end points on a continuum. However, even if there is not a clear distinction between these two different types of ambiguity, it is important to remember that words that are described as ambiguous can vary between these two extremes. (Rodd et al. , â€Å"The Advantages and Disadvantages of Semantic Ambiguity†)Ambiguity and Literature We tend to think of language as a clear and literal vehicle for accurately communicating ideas. But even when we use language literally, misunderstandings arise and meanings shift. People can be intentionally or unintentionally ambiguous. Nevertheless, when someone uses a potentially ambiguous sentence or expression, usually the intention was to express only one meaning. As we know, most words can have denotations, apparent meanings, connotations and implied or hidden meanings. Also, we often use words in a figurative way.Even though figurative language is more often used in poetry and fiction, it is still very common in ordinary speech. Ambiguity is a poetic vehicle. It is human nature to try to find meaning within an exchange. A text is given to us and in return we give our interpretation. Our own associations give understanding of what is presented to us. A characteristic of the late twentieth century, as well as of postmodern literature, is that certainties are continuously called into question, and thus allegory becomes a suitable form for expression.Allegory is a classic example of double discourse that avoids establishing a center within the text, because in allegory the unity of the work is provided by something that is not explicitly there. In contrast to symbols, which are generally taken to transcend the sign itself and express universal truths, allegories and metaphors divide the sign, exposing its arbitrariness. Metaphors are indeed highly appropriate postmodern devices, because they are obvious vehicles for ambiguity. A living metaphor always carries dual meanings, the literal or sentence meaning and the conveyed or utterance meaning.A metaphor induces comparison, but since the grounds of similarity are not always given, metaphors serve to emphasize the freedom of the reader as opposed to the authority of the writer (Gloss, 17-56). Taking into consideration why all the aforementioned could be considered as a curse, no example of literature better serves than the Bible. This special book, because of its central place at the heart of three of the worlds most important religions, has been subject to enormously detailed scrutiny over the centuries in an attempt to glean meaning and to determine once and for all the  proper  way of living and worshipping.